Dorothy Day turned me into a film director
"I’m not a filmmaker,” insists Claudia Larson, the writer and
director of Don’t Call Me a Saint, a documentary about Dorothy Day. The
film is an honest and beautiful portrait of Day’s life. And if you’d
seen it, you would be forgiven for thinking that Larson is an expert in
filmmaking.
Larson spent 15 years making the documentary.
When I ask her how she became so committed to preserving Day’s memory,
she says with a laugh: “It’s as though Dorothy walked up my front
stairs, knocked on my door and, like a fool, I answered it. She just
moved in and made me do it.”
Larson made the movie even though
she had never been to film school and she also paid for the production
mostly out of her own pocket. “I learned as I went along,” she says with
breathless enthusiasm.
She is certain that it was Day’s
spirit that guided her. “I was consumed with researching her life and if
it never came to anything, that would have been OK because it was a
great journey. But I knew Dorothy was too practical. She didn’t just
want me to have lots of historical stories to keep to myself.”
Listening
to Larson, I have the strong impression that she and Day were close
friends. But they never met. Day was born in Brooklyn and died at the
age of 83 in 1980 in the residence she founded for homeless women.
Larson grew up in Los Angeles and, although she lived in New York for
many years, she never heard of Day or the Catholic Worker Movement. It
was in the early 1990s that she began to chronicle Day’s life and was
very determined to have “Dorothy tell her own story with no interference
from me”. She insists that the film is “pure Dorothy”.
Larson
even goes as far to say that “Dorothy directed the content and the
length of the film”. The stars of the documentary are the people who
were closest to Day: her good friends and, most notably, her daughter
Tamar. Larson used the medium of cinema to capture on camera those who
knew Day best. The clock was ticking because some of her interviewees
were nearing the end of their lives and many have now died.
Was
Larson making the film because she is a Catholic who yearned to
document Day as a celebrated convert to Catholicism? “No. The fact that
I’m a Catholic has no bearing on the film,” says Larson, “I am a cradle
Catholic but I didn’t make the film because Dorothy was Catholic.”
This
confounds me, because Larson’s film focuses on Day’s devotion to the
works of mercy. Digging deep as to why Larson did not single out Day’s
Catholicism, she says: “I didn’t want to alienate anyone and Catholics
are not the only ones interested in her. People of all faiths are drawn
to Dorothy and to studying her work. Many an atheist is fascinated by
Dorothy Day.”
When the film premiered at the prestigious
Tribeca Film Festival in 2006, Larson was reproached by one audience
member for not concentrating on Day’s relationship with the Catholic
Church. Larson says: “If I had focused solely on Day’s Catholicism it
could have been a three-hour film.”
As I’m someone who finds
Day’s conversion to Catholicism mesmerising, I appreciated the way
Larson’s film portrayed Day’s strong faith as an integral part of her
life. Don’t Call Me A Saint doesn’t create a divide between Day’s faith
and social activism, but treats them as they were: completely
interrelated.
A stirring section of the film covers Dorothy
Day’s time as a reporter at the Hunger March in Washington DC in 1932.
Day felt very conflicted because she wanted to employ her Left-wing
practices, but felt they were at odds with her Catholicism. So she
prayed at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate
Conception that she would find methods to help the poor in a way that
sat well with her faith.
The next day, she went back to New York and
found Peter Maurin waiting for her. Maurin had been a Christian Brother
for a time, but now sought out Day as his collaborator. Together they
founded The Catholic Worker in May 1933, but Day always credited Maurin
as being the primary founder.
Larson’s film bridges an
important gap by showing how Maurin became Day’s teacher – sharing with
her his system of combining Catholic beliefs with a blend of radical
socialism. Maurin and Day aimed to put as many of the works of mercy
into practice as possible.
There are many earnest Catholics
who distrust Maurin and Day because they find it hard to accept Day’s
Left-wing sympathies, and see Day’s political views as incompatible with
Catholicism. So it’s important to ask if Larson has strong political
allegiances that influenced the film. “No, I’m not a Catholic Worker,”
she says. “I don’t have any political agenda. Maybe that’s why Dorothy
knocked on my door.”
Larson’s film shows that Day was not a
textbook Left-winger, but rather that her greatest teachers were the
poor people who crossed her path. The most striking example is the
film’s interview with Eileen Egan, a close friend of Day’s, who relates
what Day did after a gut-wrenching tragedy. It was the 1930s and America
was in the depths of the Great Depression. Two female friends came to
the soup kitchen. They were homeless and so asked Day if they could stay
the night. Day could not find an inch of space for them: people were
already sleeping on every floor.
Later, one of the women returned. Day
asked her where her friend was. She told Day that her friend was so
distraught at not having a place to sleep in the soup kitchen that she
had gone to a subway station and thrown herself under a train. Cut to
the heart, Day took her last five dollars, went down the street and
found an empty apartment. She put the five dollars on the table,
offering it as a deposit, and the flat became the Catholic Worker
Movement’s first house of hospitality. There are now more than 180
houses of hospitality across the globe.
There are other
tear-jerking moments when the film focuses on the crowds of severely
mentally ill people who congregated in the houses of hospitality. One
interviewee, Pat Jordan, tells of two mentally ill guests who caused a
disruption. One of them went out naked on to the fire escape. They had
to be asked to leave the house. But they came back on Easter Sunday and
were welcomed with open arms. Their behaviour was never held against
them. Thus, Pat Jordan concludes, they were forgiven “77 times seven”,
as Jesus commanded.
Larson does not consider herself a
particularly good Catholic, but her film shows clearly how Day abandoned
herself to Divine Providence. One story is likely to resonate with
readers who struggle with high fuel costs during wintry weather. One
bitterly cold winter, when there was no coal to light the furnace, Day
had only one piece of coal left. As St Joseph was patron of the
Catholic Worker house, she put the last piece of coal beside his statue.
Without any notice, an anonymous benefactor ordered a truckload of coal
and it was delivered that very evening.
Larson
tells another story that illustrates how Day learned from the poor,
“Dorothy and Eileen Egan were on a boat going down the Thames in London.
It was chilly and they were only wearing cloth coats. Dorothy took the
Times, divided it with Eileen, and stuffed her half inside her coat,
saying that she had learned how to keep warm from the men on the
Bowery.”
Larson’s film does not shy away from the
grittier aspects of serving the poorest of the poor. There are snippets
of a television interview with Day, in which Day tells the viewers that
the Brooklyn police brought old women who had been sleeping in abandoned
buildings to the Catholic Worker house so that Day could care for them.
Day described elderly woman as being covered in lice and suffering from
a prolapsed rectum. It was not unusual for the police to drop off
people who were drenched in their own urine.
Don’t Call Me a
Saint is both a poetic and harrowing piece of cinema. For a film that
was a decade and a half in the making, it is concise, coming in at just
55 minutes. It’s clear that Larson took great care in choosing each
frame of the film. “It’s the length that Dorothy wanted,” she says, “so
it would fit in a classroom time-frame.”
Larson will not allow
me to give her any credit for the documentary, insisting that “Dorothy
made me do this film”. I keep asking her Larson why she feels so
attracted to Day. She says: “I related to Dorothy’s daughter Tamar,
because my mother was a single working mom.” Tamar was Day’s only child
from her relationship with Forster Batterham. Larson appears to see a
lot of her own mother in Day and that sheds light on why she has such
immense respect for Day, and a burning love of making Day’s legacy
known.
To find out more about Don’t Call Me a Saint and to buy a DVD of film, visit Dorothydaydoc.com
This interview was carried in the October 31st 2014 print edition of The Catholic Herald.
I have much to learn about Day. I can tell that this film will be worth finding.
ReplyDeleteDay's attitude toward her religion and to her social work reminds me of the dictum about harnessing an ox and an ass to the same plow.
ReplyDelete